Now the womb of the Black woman is seen as the latest battleground
for oppression. In times past, the Blacks couldn't grow kids fast
enough for their 'masters' to harvest. Now that [Black] power is near,
the 'masters' want us to call a moratorium on having babies. When
looked at in context, the whole [abortion] mess adds up to blatant
genocide.
Erma Clardy Craven, chairwoman, Minneapolis
Commission of Human Relations.[1]
Anti-Life Philosophy.
If abortion becomes illegal, incredible numbers of poor women,
including many women of oppressed nationalities, will die horrible
deaths ... there is a very racist side to the bourgeoisie's attacks on
abortion. When women of color are denied control of their own
reproduction, this contributes to the overall conditions of national
oppression in this country ...
Revolutionary Communist Party of the United
States.[2]
Abortion Is Racial Genocide!
Government family planning programs designed for poor Blacks which
emphasize birth control and abortion with the intent of limiting the
Black population is genocide. The deliberate killing of Black babies
by abortion is genocide perhaps the most overt form of all.
Dick Gregory.[3]
The Argument.
Pro-abortionists commonly argue that any pro-life activism directed
towards the elimination of legal abortion (or the refusal to fund
abortions for poor women) is racist, because 'women of color' would not
be able to exercise their "rights" in the same manner as White
women.
Whose "Rights?"
Unscrupulous pro-abortionists have made clear their contempt for
minorities ever since Margaret Sanger railed against Blacks in her Birth
Control Review more than a half-century ago.
So why do they cry so loudly about "women of color" now?
The answer is quite obvious. They are using Black and poor women as a
cover to protect their "right" to kill their own unborn
children. After all, there would not be much public sympathy for the
typical abortion patient, who happens to be White, 22 years old,
unmarried (and therefore pregnant as a result of fornication), and
perfectly capable of paying for her own abortion(s).
Two False Assumptions.
Pro-abortionists who argue that minority women must have easy access
to abortion make two false implicit (unstated) assumptions;
That all people must have equal access to everything,
bad or good, in the name of equality. This is equivalent to saying
that the criminalization of drug use is racist, because 'women of
color' are generally poor, and cannot afford the very latest and most
potent drugs, and
That abortion is a desirable 'good' that must be made available
to all women by society.
The Overt Racists in the Pro-Abortion Movement.
Planned Parenthood's policies are made by upper-middle-class White
people who have a fetish about controlling the reproductive capacities
of others, especially those who are poor and Black.
Erma Clardy Craven.[4]
Planned Parenthood's Role.
Planned Parenthood, founded by racist/eugenicist Margaret Sanger,
promotes abortion relentlessly among Blacks. More than 80 percent of
PP's sixty efficient abortion mills are located in areas generally
classified as 'inner city.' These areas possess a very large proportion
of minorities: Usually more than fifty percent.
In fact, the number of abortion clinics in a large city generally
correlates closely to the size of that town's minority population.
Figure 78-1 shows that there are at least fifty percent more abortion
clinics per million people in cities that have large minority
populations, compared to those cities with smaller minority populations.
FIGURE 78-1
COMPARISON OF ABORTION CLINIC DENSITY IN CITIES WITH HIGH AND LOW
MINORITY POPULATIONS
[A medium text size on your computer's 'view'
setting is recommended, otherwise, the tables may be discombobulated.]
Clinics
Population
Per
(Millions)
Percent Total Million
Metropolitan Statistical Area Total
Minority Minority Clinics People
MAJOR CITIES WITH 25 PERCENT AND GREATER MINORITY POPULATIONS
San Antonio,
Texas
1.298
0.763
58.8%
12 9.2
Miami-Fort Lauderdale, Florida
3.065
1.395
45.5%
26 8.5
Memphis,
Tennessee
0.983
0.420
42.7%
6 6.1
Los Angeles-Anaheim-
Riverside,
California
13.897
5.364
38.6%
61 4.4
Houston-Galveston-Brazoria,
Texas
3.608
1.357
37.6%
25 6.9
New Orleans,
Louisiana
1.326
0.497
37.5%
9 6.8
NY City-Northern NJ-Long Island,
NY-NJ-CT
18.114
5.779
31.9%
72 4.0
Chicago-Gary-Lake County,
IL-IN-WI
8.200
2.509
30.6%
34 4.2
Norfolk-Virginia Beach-
Newport News,
VA
1.370
0.416
30.4%
2 1.5
Richmond-Petersburg, Virginia
0.843
0.255
30.2%
5 5.9
Washington,
DC
3.724
1.117
30.0%
32 8.6
Birmingham,
Alabama
0.936
0.275
29.4%
7 7.5
Baltimore,
Maryland
2.373
0.631
26.6%
8 3.4
Dallas-Fort Worth,
Texas
3.752
0.953
25.4%
21 5.6
Atlanta,
Georgia
2.771
0.687
24.8%
11 5.1
TOTALS
66.260 22.418
33.8%
331 5.0
MAJOR CITIES WITH 15 PERCENT AND SMALLER MINORITY POPULATIONS
Milwaukee-Racine, Wisconsin
1.569
0.226
14.4%
6 3.8
Dayton-Springfield,
Ohio
0.944
0.134
14.2%
6 6.4
Louisville, Kentucky-Indiana
0.971
0.135
13.9%
4 4.2
Columbus,
Ohio
1.342
0.165
12.3%
4 3.0
Hartford-New Britain-
Middletown-Bristol, CN
1.122
0.138
12.3%
5 4.5
Cincinnati-Hamilton,
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana
1.727
0.209
12.1%
3 1.7
Buffalo-Niagara Falls, New York 1.185
0.141
11.9%
3 2.5
Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma
0.983 0.115
11.7%
4 4.1
Rochester, New
York
0.991 0.113
11.4%
2 2.0
Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, PA
2.299
0.200
8.7%
6 2.6
Boston-Lawrence-Salem-Lowell-
Brockton,
MA
3.735
0.310
8.3%
10 2.7
Seattle-Tacoma, Washington
2.388
0.160
6.7%
8 3.4
Salt Lake City-Ogden, Utah
1.066
0.065
6.1%
2 1.9
Providence-Pawtucket-
Woonsocket,
RI
0.912
0.052
5.7%
3 3.3
Portland-Vancouver, Oregon-
Washington
1.388
0.068
4.9%
3 2.2
Minneapolis-St. Paul,
Minnesota-Wisconsin
2.389
0.086
3.6%
5 2.1
TOTALS
25.011
2.317
9.3%
74 3.0
References. (1) United States Department of
Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Reference Data Book and Guide to
Sources, Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington,
DC: United States Government Printing Office. 1990 (110th Edition), 991
pages. Table 38, "Fifty Largest Metropolitan Areas Black and
Hispanic Origin Populations: 1988." (2) The number of abortion
clinics in each city was compiled by examining the corresponding 1988
and 1989 Yellow Pages, under the headings "Abortion,"
"Birth Control Information," "Clinics," and
"Physicians." An "abortion clinic" is defined here
as a single physical location where one or more physicians perform
abortions as a large portion of their practice.
The Founder's Views.
Perhaps the most cherished goal of Margaret Sanger was to eliminate
the Black race. She envisioned a program that would
... hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with
social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most
successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious
appeal. We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate
the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten
out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious
members.[5]
This quote causes us to conclude that Planned Parenthood possesses at
least a rudimentary if crude sense of humor. The recipient of the very
first Margaret Sanger Award in 1963 (bestowed for outstanding dedication
to PP's racist principles) was none other than Martin Luther King the
best-known Black minister of his time!
As everyone knows, the future of any country or race lies with its
children. Therefore, the most efficient method possible for eliminating
an entire race would be to destroy its children. And, of course, the
easiest and most efficient way to destroy children is to "nip them
in the bud," so to speak by killing them before they are born.
Sanger believed that minority human beings were nothing more than
farm animals to be bred or aborted, and this view is reflected in the
lurid terms she applied to those who did not measure up to her high
standards of perfection.
Sanger's racist viewpoint saturated her writings. For example, she
referred to Blacks and Jews as "bad stock," and to her Master
Race as a "race of thoroughbreds" in the November 1921 Birth
Control Review.
In the April 1933 issue of the same publication, she declared that
"[Slavs, Latin, and Hebrew immigrants are] Human weeds ... a
deadweight of human waste ... [Blacks, soldiers, and Jews are a] menace
to the race ... Eugenic sterilization is an urgent need ... We must
prevent multiplication of this bad [Black] stock."
It is interesting that the masthead slogan of the Birth Control
Review was "Creating a Race of Thoroughbreds." In 1933,
the magazine featured an article entitled "Eugenic Sterilization:
An Urgent Need," authored by Adolf Hitler's Director of Genetic
Sterilization and founder of the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene Ernst
Rudin!
Lothrop Stoddard sat on the board of the American Birth Control
League (later Planned Parenthood) in the 1930s, when Margaret Sanger
headed it. Havelock Ellis, one of Sanger's lovers, enthusiastically
endorsed Stoddard's book The Rising Tide of Color Against White
World-Supremacy in Sanger's magazine The Birth Control Review.[6]
In this book (introduced by fellow racist/eugenicist Madison Grant),
Stoddard demonstrates beyond a shadow of reasonable doubt the intimate
connections between abortion, eugenics and goal-oriented racism;[7]
... upon the quality of human life all else depends ... none
of the colored races shows perceptible signs of declining birth-rate,
all tending to breed up to the limits of available subsistence ... It
can mean only one thing: a tremendous and steadily augmenting outward
thrust of surplus colored men from overcrowded colored homelands ...
But many of these relatively empty [Northern] lands have been
definitely set aside by the White man as his own special heritage ...
His ["colored" man's] outstanding quality is
superabundant animal vitality. In this he easily surpasses all other
races. To it he owes his intense emotionalism. To it, again, is due
his extreme fecundity, the negro being the quickest of breeders. This
abounding vitality shows in many other ways, such as the negro's
ability to survive harsh conditions of slavery under which other races
have soon succumbed ... black blood, once entering a human stock,
seems never really bred out again ...
White men cannot, under peril of their vary race-existence, allow
wholesale Asian immigration into White race-areas ... The grim truth
of the matter is this: The whole White race is exposed, immediately or
ultimately, to the possibility of social sterilization and final
replacement or absorption by the teeming colored races.
And, of course, the more primitive a type is, the more prepotent it
is. This is why crossings with the negro are uniformly fatal. Whites,
Amerindians, or Asiatics all are alike vanquished by the invincible
prepotency of the more primitive, generalized, and lower negro blood.
... whether we consider interwhite migrations or colored
encroachments on White lands, the net result is an expansion of lower
and a contraction of higher stocks, the process being thus a disgenic
one.
For race-betterment is such an intensely practical matter! When
peoples come to realize that the quality of the population is the
source of all their prosperity, progress, security, and even
existence; we shall see much-abused "eugenics" actually
moulding social programmes and political policies ... we or the next
generation will take in hand the problem of race-depreciation, and
segregation of defectives and abolition of handicaps penalizing the
better stocks will put an end to our present racial decline.
Notice how, near the end of the second paragraph, Stoddard lets slip
that he does not consider Blacks to be human.
Does this sound familiar?
Remember that Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood,
heartily approved of the contents of Stoddard's book.
Notice also how Stoddard waxes prophetic in the last paragraph. His
prophecy, unfortunately, has finally been transformed into practice. It
is our benighted generation that has taken up the task of
"abolishing handicaps" and dealing with
"race-depreciation" by employing the devastatingly effective
weapon of racially-directed abortion.
Staying the Course.
Although it has been challenged to do so many times, Planned
Parenthood has never once repudiated the racist attitude or
writings of Margaret Sanger. Quite the contrary: The organization is
extremely proud of her views!
Faye Wattleton, former president of the Planned Parenthood Federation
of America (and who is herself a token Black), stated at PPFA's annual
luncheon in St. Louis, on May 2, 1979, "I believe Margaret Sanger
would have been proud of us today if she had seen the directions that we
have most recently in this organization taken."[8]
And Planned Parenthood's work continues. Sanger's grandson, Alexander
C. Sanger, became President and Chief Executive Officer of Planned
Parenthood of New York City in January of 1991. This organization has a
budget of $18 million a year and 250 full-time workers. Sanger boasted
that
I intend to be out on the front lines of our issues. That is why
I'm here ... Right now, we have three clinics in this city and I want
ten more. We currently have a small storefront office in central
Harlem, and it is my first priority to see if we can transform that
into a clinic ... With all her success, my grandmother left some
unfinished business, and I intend to finish it.[9]
Seeing how his grandmother desired to "exterminate the Black
race," a clinic in Harlem would certainly be an efficient way to
"finish it."
The racists have every reason to be proud. There currently exists a
deadly inequity between the abortion ratios of White women and minority
women in this country. Figures 78-2 and 78-3 show that minority women
obtain abortions at more than twice the rate that White women do. This
lends credibility to Erma Clardy Craven's statement that abortion is
racial genocide. It also dovetails quite nicely with Planned
Parenthood's racist philosophy of "more children from the fit, less
from the unfit."
FIGURE 78-2
UNITED STATES LEGAL ABORTION RATIOS BY RACE, 1972 TO 1992
Annual Abortions Per
Legal
Abortions
1,000 Women
Year
Total
White
Minority
White Minority
Ratio
1972
586,800
455,300
131,500
11.8
21.7 184%
1973
744,600
569,200
175,400
13.5
27.9 207%
1974
898,600
648,000
250,600
15.4
33.7 219%
1975
1,034,200
701,000
333,200
17.2
49.7 289%
1976
1,179,300
784,600
394,700
18.8
56.3 299%
1977
1,316,700
888,100
427,900
20.9
59.0 282%
1978
1,409,400
969,400
440,000
22.3
58.7 263%
1979 1,497,700
1,062,400
435,300
24.0
56.2 234%
1980 1,553,900
1,093,600
460,300
24.3
56.5 228%
1981 1,577,300
1,107,700
469,600
24.3
55.9 229%
1982 1,573,900
1,095,200
478,700
23.8
55.5 233%
1983 1,575,000
1,084,400
490,600
23.3
55.5 237%
1984 1,577,200
1,078,900
498,300
23.1
54.3 235%
1985 1,588,100
1,066,500
521,600
22.6
55.5 246%
1986
1,475,000
997,600
477,400
22.5
57.0 253%
1987 1,510,000
1,002,600
507,400
22.8
58.5 257%
1988 1,540,000
1,007,000
533,000
23.5
59.6 254%
1989 1,520,000
1,012,200
507,800
22.4
57.8 258%
1990 1,535,000
1,023,600
511,400
22.7
57.9 255%
1991 1,545,000
1,004,500
540,500
22.6
58.5 259%
1992
1,540,000
998,500
541,500
23.3
59.1 254%
28,777,700 19,651,000
9,126,700
23.1
57.0 247%
References. (1) United States Department of
Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Reference Data Book and Guide to
Sources, Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington,
DC: United States Government Printing Office. 1990 (110th Edition).
Table 100, "Legal Abortions Estimated Number, Rate, and Ratio, By
Race: 1972 to 1985." (2) S.J.D. Forrest, E. Sullivan, and C. Tietze.
"Abortion in the United States, 1978-1979." Alan Guttmacher
Institute, Family Planning Perspectives, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1981.
(3) Peggy Cuddy. "Abortion and Racial Genocide." ALL About
Issues, October 1983, pages 23 and 24.
GRAPH NOT AVAILABLE
References. (1) United States Department of
Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Reference Data Book and Guide to
Sources, Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington,
DC: United States Government Printing Office. 1990 (110th Edition).
Table 100, "Legal Abortions Estimated Number, Rate, and Ratio, By
Race: 1972 to 1985." (2) S.J.D. Forrest, E. Sullivan, and C. Tietze.
"Abortion in the United States, 1978-1979." Alan Guttmacher
Institute, Family Planning Perspectives, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1981.
(3) Peggy Cuddy. "Abortion and Racial Genocide." ALL About
Issues, October 1983, pages 23 to 26.
Current Racism.
The attitude of utter contempt towards minorities waxes strong among
latter-day abortionists. Perhaps this is because more than 90 percent of
all abortionists are White males. These killers have been far
more effective and deadly at exterminating the Black race than any
number of goose-stepping Nazi goons could ever be; the abortionists have
labored in anonymity, virtually unchallenged behind their formidable
wall of attorneys and corrupt judges, as they have exterminated more
than eight million Black babies.
Delores Bernadette Grier, in her testimony before the Senate Labor
and Human Resources Committee during its May 1990 hearing on the
so-called "Freedom of Choice Act," said that "Black women
never requested, demanded nor demonstrated for the right to have an
abortion. It was thrust upon us as a solution to our social and economic
crises. The White master is still telling Black people what is best for
us death instead of life. 97 percent of the abortionists who kill unborn
Black babies are White American males ..."[10]
Edwardian Slips.
Sometimes the White racist mega-abortionists even 'slip up' in public
and reveal their true feelings and objectives, as shown in the following
quotes.
I would do free abortions in Mexico to stem the new influx of
Hispanic immigrants. Their lack of respect for democracy and social
order is frightening ... When a sullen Black woman of 17 or 18 can
decide to have a baby and get welfare and food stamps and become a
burden to all of us, it's time to stop. In parts of South Los Angeles,
having babies for welfare is the only industry these people have.
California abortionist Edward Allred.[11]
Above all, society must grasp the grim relationship between
unwanted children and the violent rebellion of minority groups.
Lawrence Lader, co-founder of the National
Abortion Rights Action League.[12]
Legal abortion will result in a reduction in welfare roles.
National Abortion Rights Action League.[13]
Even far-Left and Marxist theorists occasionally become momentarily
coherent and recognize the starkly racist nature of the abortion-mad
population controllers. Alexander Cockburn, one of the most prolific
writers on the Left, declared that
The not-so-concealed theme of some major figures in NARAL [National
Abortion Rights Action League] and NOW [National Organization for
Women] was that abortion should be legal because the most prolific
breeders were welfare mothers from the dangerous classes ... the
leader of NARAL in New York lobbied against the provisions to protect
poor minority women from involuntary sterilization, and so did Planned
Parenthood.[14]
Slaughtering Black Women for Money.
White male abortionists not only kill Black babies, they also kill
young Black women at a tremendous rate.
Chapter 59, "Maternal Deaths Due to Abortion," lists the
names of nearly two hundred women who have died of so-called "safe
and legal" abortion. The races of 118 of these women has been
positively identified. The dead women included 42 Blacks, 17 Latinas, 7
Orientals, and 52 Whites. This means that 56 percent of all known legal
abortion deaths have occurred among minority women.
By comparison, Figure 78-2 shows that minority women obtain only
30.8% of all abortions.
This means that the death rate among minority women who obtain
abortions is fully three times higher than that of White women
who abort (7.0 per 100,000 abortions for Black women and 2.2 per 100,000
abortions for White women). This number is confirmed by Planned
Parenthood, which has admitted that the risks of abortion for Black
women are more than three times as high as for White women.
Planned Parenthood states that the death rates for second-trimester
abortions for Black and White women respectively are 24.8 and 6.8 deaths
per 100,000 abortions.[15]
The death rate among poor minority women may be even higher than this
estimate, because such women have been disenfranchised from the system
and do not trust attorneys or anything to do with litigation, for good
reason and therefore do not press their claims.
Nobody seems to care about this continuing slaughter, least of all
those who hypocritically call themselves "pro-choice." In
fact, the pro-aborts put on their best 'indignant' act and puff up with
anger and rage whenever anyone suggests that they might be supporting
genocide. For example, Helen I. Howe, a spokesperson for the phony front
group that calls itself the 'Religious' Coalition for Abortion Rights,
alleged that "RCAR views it as an insult to black women to make the
generalized claim that abortions performed on black women are
genocide."[16]
What is the truth in this matter?
One Black mother, Mattie Byrd, recently mourned her dead daughter
Belinda in a letter to a friend as she said that
I cry every day when I think of how horrible her death was. She was
slashed by them and then she bled to death ... Where is [the
abortionist] now? Has he been stopped? Has anything happened to him
because of what he did to my Belinda? ... People tell me nothing has
happened, that nothing ever happens to White abortionists who leave
young Black women dead.[17]
Stephen Pine of the Inglewood Women's Hospital was the busy
abortionist who killed Belinda Byrd. She was his 74th abortion of the
day!
Pine perforated Byrd's uterus and she died three days later. As a
partial result of this botched abortion, the Inglewood Women's Hospital
had its license revoked by the State of California and closed down.
However, money is a great motivator, and it opened only two weeks later
with a different name: The West Coast Women's Medical Group. It was
subsequently bought by mega-abortionist Edward Allred (who has also
killed several women), and still functions to this day.
The New Eugenics.
Legal abortion will result in a reduction in welfare roles.
The National Abortion Rights Action League.[13]
Spawn of a Rotten Seed.
The eugenics movement is inherently and irreversibly racist because
it considers minorities to be handicapped or somehow deficient because
of their skin color. Chapter 105 of Volume III, "Eugenics,"
describes in detail how this movement flourished in the United States
during the 1920s, and how this line of thought led to the establishment
of the Nazi eugenics program in the early 1930s.
One of the first eugenicists was none other than Charles Darwin, who
wrote in his work The Descent of Man that;
With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and
those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We
civilized men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process
of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the
sick; we institute poorlaws; and our medical men exert their utmost
skill to save the life of everyone to the last moment. There is reason
to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak
constitution would formerly have succumbed to smallpox. Thus the weak
members of civilized society propagate their kind.
No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will
doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is
surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to
the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man
himself, hardly anyone is do ignorant as to allow his worst animals to
breed.[18]
A Eugenics Expert Speaks.
A very concise and complete summation of the innate racism of the
fully-devolved eugenicist philosophy is provided to us by Norman E.
Hines in his 1938 book Practical Birth-Control Methods;
All the rights we have are those granted to us by society.
Certainly there is no natural right to spawn defective children who
must be supported by others through taxation or charity. The crisis in
this instance is the enormous expense to the state of the care of the
defective classes and the contamination of the biological stock which
results from their reproduction ... While sterilization is no
substitute for segregation, it is also true that segregation is no
substitute for sterilization. They must go hand in hand.
Ever since the rise of the Nazi regime in Germany an objection that
has frequently been raised against eugenical sterilization is that a
voluntary sterilization program may turn into a compulsory one. Some
thoughtful people sincerely fear this. But the history of eugenical
sterilization in the United States and in other democratic countries
offers little warrant for the contention. This is the old fallacy of
ultimate danger; that if we take step A, it would lead to step B; that
if we take step B. it may lead to step C, and so forth without end.
The evidence now available shows that even in Nazi Germany, where
there is a great deal of compulsion that would not be tolerated by
citizens who believe in democracy, there has been as yet no attempt to
sterilize any special racial group ...
Most of the objections to eugenical sterilization are based upon
unfounded fears, insufficient knowledge, or faulty reasoning. None of
the objections has substantial merit. They are comparable to the
arguments made ten years ago against birth control, even by some
supposedly well-informed individuals, that birth-control devices
caused sterility, necessarily led to immorality, would cause 'race
suicide,' were unreliable, etc.
... we do not need the defective classes. They are already an
excessive burden upon the State. A few special students of the problem
even believe that our society is undergoing a "moronization"
process; that the intelligence level of the American people is
declining because the gifted have few children and the stupid many ...
Probably it will take society a span of years to learn how to use it
[eugenic sterilization] properly as a weapon for its own improvement
...[19]
Note the author's representation and summation of classic eugenicist
theories, which, despite their antique quaintness, are still deadly
poisonous to this day;
that all rights are granted by the State, even the right to
life of the handicapped;
that "defectives" are expensive and "contaminate
the biological stock," and therefore society does not need
"the defective classes;"
that the slippery slope theory (here called the "ultimate
danger fallacy" has no merit, and, in fact, all anti-eugenicist
arguments are baseless and originate from ignorance; and
that birth control methods are reliable, do not cause physical
damage, do not lead to immorality, and may one day be compulsory.
It is amusing indeed that Hines tried bravely to debunk the
"ultimate danger" (slippery slope) theory by stating that
there was "little warrant" for the contention that Nazi
Germany's voluntary sterilization program might turn into a campaign of
compulsory sterilization. Hines' book was first published in August
1938. Unknown to him, a compulsory sterilization program had already
begun in Nazi Germany.
He also feigned ignorance of the fact that, by 1938, several states
had created Boards of Eugenics that typically endorsed involuntary
sterilization and castration for such reasons as "feeble minded,
insane, epileptic, habitual criminal, degenerates and sexual perverts
reported to it who will probably become a social menace or ward of the
State."[20]
So much for disproving the "slippery slope" theory! And
yet, modern-day eugenicists are following Hines' lead as they insist
that they can control the extent to which their "reforms" are
applied in society.
Eugenics Advances in the '60s.
Beginning in 1965, euthanasia and eugenics advocates advanced, almost
unseen, behind an almost unbroken string of pro-abortion political and
judicial successes. As this multi-pronged wave of death surged forward,
the most helpless people of all were naturally the first target they
invariably are.
And so, the unborn, the old and infirm, and poor Blacks found
themselves in greater danger than ever before.
"Good Germans" Again?
As far back as 1971 two years before nationwide legalized abortion
the National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence found
that "The overwhelming majority of White Americans would be 'Good
Germans' if the government turned to massive racial
repression."[21]
Why was this study performed in the first place unless members of the
Commission perceived an actual threat?
As it turned out, there was ample cause for the Commission's concern;
experts testified that there had already been many cases of outright
propaganda and coercion directed against minorities by governmental and
quasi-governmental agencies in numerous States;
In the 1960s, Chicago's Planned Parenthood Association
sponsored birth control "coffee parties" all over the Black
sections of the city but not a single one in the White-dominated
suburbs.[22]
Representatives of Federally financed family planning programs
sent a brigade of "home visitors" and public assistance
workers to thousands of homes of indigent Black Pittsburgh women in
order to coerce them into visiting and making use of family planning
clinic's services. If a woman did not immediately comply, workers
would directly threaten her with a cutoff of all public assistance if
she had any more children. When Black citizens exposed this coercion
and called it "genocide," the Pittsburgh Antipoverty Board
voted down funds from the Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO) that
would have continued Planned Parenthood clinics in six of the city's
poorer neighborhoods.[23]
In the 1960s, the South Carolina and Delaware Legislatures
considered laws that would mandate the sterilization of all welfare
mothers after they had borne two children out of wedlock. In New York,
municipal judges commonly offered women the choice of sterilization or
no welfare money.[24]
Dr. Constance Redbird Uri testified before her State
legislature that "What is family planning for Indians? The
highest priority is abortion. We have been controlled by your
government for 200 years now, but you have another weapon [abortion].
We often doubt whether we will be here in another 200 years."
Raoul Silva testified that "California is waging a war of
genocide against Blacks, Latins, and Indians. They offer abortions to
minority women who don't even ask and they get teenage girls to decide
for abortion before they're pregnant. That's how they play the
genocide game in Los Angeles County."[25]
And They're Still At It ...
The corrupt and racist theory of eugenics, which seeks to create a
"race of thoroughbreds" through birth control, abortion, and
sterilization (without consent, if necessary) certainly did not die with
Adolf Hitler in 1945. It is worrisome indeed to discover that some of
the world's most distinguished and influential scholars and social
engineers still advocate the widespread use of eugenics to rid society
of its ever-present "undesirable elements."
Two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling has suggested that
those who carry "dysfunctional genes" have information on
their disabilities tattooed in code onto their foreheads.[26] While
we're at it, why don't we take just a few extra minutes and tattoo the
numbers "666" there as well?
'Distinguished' biologist John Maynard Smith would like to give
tax breaks and bonuses to the educated and intelligent who have
children and heavily penalize others (i.e. minorities and those with
"dysfunctional genes."[27]
Perhaps not surprisingly, the omnipresent population controller
Garrett Hardin weighed in with his eugenicist views in the June 1992
issue of Omni Magazine; "It would be better to encourage
the breeding of more intelligent people rather than the less
intelligent. ZPG's entire attraction has been among the college
population. So in effect, ZPG is encouraging college-educated people
to have fewer children instead of encouraging reduced fertility among
the less intelligent."[28]
A Washington state doctor, Bruce Tracy, urged the state Senate
to provide sterilization bounties for women on welfare. The measure,
Senate Bill 6379, sponsored by Senator Scott Barr, would pay $10,000
to a woman if she agreed to be neutered after her first child, and
$5,000 if she agreed after the second child. The bill would also give
$500 to men who got neutered after fathering a welfare child.[29]
NORPLANT: Abort 'Em or
Neuter 'Em.
It takes little imagination to see that the unborn Black baby is
the real object of many abortionists. Except for the privilege of
aborting herself, the Black woman and her family must fight for every
other social and economic privilege ... The quality of life for the
poor, Black, and the oppressed will not be served by destroying their
children.
Erma Clardy Craven.[4]
Introduction.
Abortion is a marvelously efficient weapon for the population
controllers, but it has its drawbacks. It is expensive, messy, and worst
of all it is being exposed as a racist institution by the very people
the abortionists accuse of being prejudiced.
For decades, the popcon fanatics have dreamed about a means of
neutering minority women that would be quick, efficient, and private.
And the concept of a "safe and handy" abortifacient is
certainly nothing new. A quarter-century ago, Garrett Hardin and other
population theorists fantasized that the dominant
"contraceptive" of the future would be an efficient
abortifacient pill.[30]
Your Wish is Granted, Master.
It appears that the science genie has finally granted the population
controller's wish. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
approved the abortifacient "contraceptive" NORPLANT for public
use on December 10, 1990.
This "contraceptive," supposedly effective for a period of
five years, consists of six small plastic tubes inserted into a woman's
upper arm. Once implanted, these tubes slowly release the drug
levonorgestrel, an abortifacient that prevents implantation of the
developing human being. A woman being used by NORPLANT will therefore be
blissfully unaware that she is aborting several times each year.
The FDA warns that NORPLANT "... should not be used by women who
have acute liver disease, unexplained vaginal bleeding, breast cancer,
or blood clots in the legs, lungs, or eyes."
The ominously-named Population Council owns the patent for NORPLANT
and will reap four percent of the colossal profits that will accrue from
use of the drug. It is produced by Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories in
Philadelphia, a subsidiary of American Home Products, and will cost
about $500 to insure about five years of sterility.[31]
For more information on NORPLANT, see Chapter 33.
The Dark Side of the Power.
Many people, including Law Professor Charles Rice of Notre Dame
university, see a dark side to the great convenience of NORPLANT.
Certain countries, including South Africa, have made the injectable
abortifacient Depo-Provera mandatory for teenaged schoolgirls, female
prisoners, welfare recipients, and the mentally handicapped. And now,
radical thinkers are tentatively suggesting that NORPLANT be made
mandatory in certain cases for women in the United States (for more
information on how the United States ships dangerous birth-control
devices overseas in great quantities, see Chapter 131 in Volume III,
"Overpopulation").
Oops!
With so many influential people pushing abortion and birth control on
poor minority women, it is inevitable that the secret will slip out
occasionally. Strangely, these stories seem to have little effect on the
blissfully unaware public. Typically, those pro-abortion groups that
claim to be fighting for the rights of minorities ignore these racist
incidents entirely.
In a classic recent example, deputy editorial page editor Donald
Kimelman of the Philadelphia Enquirer stated in a December 12,
1990 article, ominously entitled "Poverty and NORPLANT: Can
Contraception Reduce the Underclass?" that
As we read these two stories [about NORPLANT and Black poverty], we
asked ourselves: Dare we mention them in the same breath? To do so
might be considered deplorably insensitive, perhaps raising the
specter of eugenics. But it would be worse to avoid drawing the
logical conclusion that foolproof contraception could be invaluable in
breaking the cycle of inner city poverty one of America's greatest
challenges.[32]
Kimelman continued by suggesting that welfare mothers could be
implanted with NORPLANT for free and perhaps receive increased welfare
benefits as a reward. He apparently failed to realize that this was one
of the first elements of the coercive Chinese population program that
now features mandatory sterilization and forced abortions even in the
ninth month of pregnancy.
Who is the Target?
We might ask ourselves this question: If Kimelman and his fellow
"thinkers" were truly concerned about poverty in general, why
did he not also recommend the use of NORPLANT for poor White
women?
Others apparently asked this same question. Vanessa Williams,
president of the Philadelphia chapter of the National Association of
Black Journalists, called Kimelman's article "A tacit endorsement
of slow genocide."[33]
Inquirer columnist Steve Lopez sarcastically suggested on
December 16th that contraception would not reduce the underclass quite
so fast as "just shooting them."
The Enquirer publicly apologized for its racist article on the
22nd of December, after a wave of complaints. But the damage had been
done; the truly racist nature of the thinking of some very influential
people had been exposed once again.
Abortion As Human Culling. Kimelman was not the only racist
journalist to step on his tongue after NORPLANT was released to the
public. Anthony Bouza, the former Minneapolis Police Chief and columnist
for the Minneapolis Star Tribune, wrote a 1990 Mother's Day
editorial with the incredibly oxymoronic title "A Mother's Day
Wish: Make Abortion Available to All Women."
He described the "at risk" population as "poor, Black
and Indian," and said that their offspring are "marked for
failure." Then he went on by stating that
When abortions are illegal, poor women deliver and keep their
babies. Then they plunk them in front of a TV set, watch them get
abused and conditioned to violence by parades of males, and expose
them to all the factors the criminologists describe as the precursors
to a life of crime ... Making abortions freely available to the
impoverished young women who produce our criminals is very likely the
most important crime-prevention measure adopted in this country in the
last 25 years.[34]
Bouza's astounding racist stupidity is even more remarkable in light
of the fact that he is a former police chief. If his thesis is true that
abortion is our "most important crime-prevention measure" why
is our country's rape rate 250 percent higher than it was before
abortion was legalized in 1973? Why has our murder rate doubled in the
last twenty years? Why has child abuse exploded more than 500 percent
during the same period? Why is our prison population now nearly one
million, double what it was before Roe v. Wade? If abortion is so
effective at "crime-fighting," why does the United States
possess the dubious distinction of having the largest percentage of its
population imprisoned among all the countries of the world, including
the former Soviet Union, Cuba, and South Africa?
Don't expect answers to these questions from pro-abortionists
especially pro-abortion journalists. They have a very big axe to grind,
and nobody had better bother them with the facts.
Journalists Kimelman and Bouza are not the only people who think that
abortion can be used to cull out society's "undesirable
elements" who, incidentally, always seem to come from minority
populations.
Dr. David A. Hamburg of the psychiatry department of the Stanford
University Medical School has approved of the UNESCO (United Nations
Scientific and Cultural Organization) theory that abortion might be a
way to prevent a future Genghis Khan or Hitler from being born.[35] The
implementation of such an abortion program would require the mandatory
genetic testing of all unborn babies via amniocentesis or chorionic
villi sampling (CVS), and the mandatory abortion of those babies whose
genes were deemed "unsatisfactory" by the eugenicists. This
figure would vary from 20 to 50 percent of all pregnancies.
Getting With the Program.
Immediately after NORPLANT was introduced to the public, several
judges ordered women (usually poor Blacks) onto the drug because they
had been convicted of the abuse of previous children. In one such case,
Tulare County (California) Superior Court Judge Howard R. Broadman gave
Darlene Johnson a very simple but coercive choice: Be sterilized with
NORPLANT or go to jail for two to four years.[36]
Number One on the Hit Parade.
Of course, NORPLANT is not the only tool used by modern racists to
neuter women from "undesirable" classes. The all-time number
one favorite tool for this purpose has been and is the "Mississippi
Appendectomy" surgical sterilization without knowledge or full
informed consent of those being operated on.
The United States court system bestowed its imprimatur upon
eugenic sterilization in 1927, when Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell
Holmes wrote the majority opinion in the Court's Buck v. Bell
decision, which upheld the enforced sterilization of poor Black women.
Holmes held that; "We have seen more than once that the public
welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be
strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of
the State for these lesser sacrifices ... Three generations of imbeciles
are enough."[37]
Following the lead of the Supreme Court, thirty states had enacted
laws that mandated sterilization for the poor by 1933.[38] This eugenic
sterilization law was reversed by the Supreme Court only as recently as
1972. But the damage had been done.
These laws followed the Model Eugenical Sterilization Law,
promulgated by Harry H. Laughlin, director of the Eugenics Record
Office. They called for the sterilization of criminals, mental patients,
the retarded, the blind, deaf, diseased, and alcoholics, and for
dependents upon society the homeless, orphans, and tramps.[39] It was
not coincidental that Blacks made up a percentage of those sterilized
that was grossly out of proportion to their actual representation in
such "undesirable classes."
From 1924 to the early 1970s, more than 7,500 poor men and women
(almost all of them Black) were forcibly sterilized in the State of
Virginia alone. Of course, these operations were performed in approved
"mental health facilities" on "unwed mothers,
prostitutes, petty criminals and children with disciplinary
problems."[40]
Other laws drafted by American eugenicists mandated segregation of
those with birth defects and mental disabilities in state-run
institutions. No inmate ever left these places with their reproductive
organs intact they were all neutered like stray dogs. In some states,
all of those inmates who carried hereditary disabilities were
sterilized. Other state regulations mandated contraceptive use by all
whose family history indicated a predisposition towards serious
hereditary defects.[40]
A person with common sense might think that this type of thinking
would die out after the eugenics-driven horrors of World War II.
Unfortunately, those who long for a better world right now always
desire it at the expense of those they consider inferior to themselves.
Destroying Cultures to Improve Them.
We hope these words will be carried by the four winds, to reach the
ears and hearts of all our Indian Tribes, so that they may learn of
the dangers to our tribal survival and be strong against the new enemy
... We belong to a culture that holds all life to be sacred ... This
belief has sustained our people throughout the long struggle for
survival ... The whiteman's culture that kills its unborn is foreign
to our way of life ... The Great Spirit gave to the Indian Woman the
duty to look after each succeeding generation ... The whiteman's
solution to the Indian Woman's poverty is to kill her unborn.
Indian Women United for Social Justice.[41]
Because of the nature of our country and the free exchange of ideas,
truly effective racist policies must "go underground" and
employ total secrecy in order to remain in existence. The classic
example of this is the concentration of abortion mills in minority
neighborhoods, as described earlier in this chapter.
However, there exists a huge and extremely powerful network of
organizations that practices overt racism on a grand and
international scale. As these institutions, larded with Western money,
hold entire nations captive, the American press feigns ignorance and
disinterest.
There are several multinational lending corporations in existence
today that loan huge sums of money to developing countries so that they
may develop and construct large-scale projects to improve the low
standard of living of their citizens. The World Bank, for example, has
for several years been considering a multi-billion dollar loan to the
People's Republic of China for the purpose of constructing the mammoth
Three Gorge Project, which would provide electricity and flood control
for the large and fertile Dongting plain north of Changsha.
However, in the mid-1960s, Paul Ehrlich's book The Population Bomb
kicked off the modern expression of the radical population control
movement. This movement, laden with radical environmentalists, sees
overpopulation as the root of all evils. Groups like Friends of the
Earth and the Sierra Club have been bringing pressure to bear on
international lending institutions, demanding that they attach
population-control "strings" to their loans.
These loan preconditions lately feature coercive population-control
conditions that, in many cases, give the receiving country a choice:
Implement our Western values regarding family and population, and
you will get your loan. Otherwise starve!
Reverend Peter Proeku Dery of Tamale, Ghana, stated that "The
World Bank denied loans to Ghana until my country agreed to institute a
nationwide contraception and family-planning policy. There was also
pressure to legalize abortion. The people have so far been able to
prevent this, but for how long, I don't know."
The United Nations Fund for Population Assistance (UNFPA), the
International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), the Rockefeller
Foundation, the World Bank, and many other rich Western organizations
have taken it upon themselves to impose their (per)version of the
"perfect world" on other countries. To the extent that this
vision provides clean drinking water, sanitation, medical facilities and
education, there can be little objection.
But when these institutions demand that poor countries employ
population control measures that conflict with their ideology and
customs, we are engaging in what can only be called racist
"contraceptive imperialism."
The Ultimate Impact of Abortion.
I fully support the right to life of every human being, from
conception until natural death. In addition, I unequivocally endorse a
total Human Life Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, that would
promote the value and integrity of every human life.
Dick Gregory.[42]
As described in Chapter 48, "The Demographic Effects of
Abortion," no race or country can continue to exist if it aborts
more than half of its heritage. Hong Kong, Germany, Italy, and most
other European countries are learning the lessons dealt by this painful
and apparently irreversible process right now.
If the Black race continues to abort at its current rate, it will
inevitably occupy a smaller and smaller percentage of this country's
population in comparison to other races, as shown in Figure 78-4. In
general, groups of people exert a degree of political and social
influence that is roughly proportional to their representation in terms
of population. Therefore, as a group slowly shrinks, its influence will
shrink at a similar rate. The Black race has always suffered from a
disproportionately small degree of influence in society; it simply
cannot afford to lose any more.
GRAPH NOT AVAILABLE
References: Calculations are based upon
demographic data contained in United States Department of Commerce,
Bureau of the Census. Reference Data Book and Guide to Sources, Statistical
Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: United States
Government Printing Office. 1990 (110th Edition), 991 pages. Table 11,
"Total Population, By Race: 1960 to 1988," Table 14,
"Estimated Components of Population Change, By Race: 1960 to
1988," Table 15, "Projections of the Hispanic Population By
Age and Sex: 1989 to 2010," and Table 16, "Projections of
Total Population, By Race: 1989 to 2025."
At this point in time, the Black race accounts for about fifteen
percent of the people in the United States. One hundred years from now,
it will constitute only about eleven percent of the total population.
What will this do to its ability to effect societal change and advance
its own interests?
Only the future will answer this critical question. All we can do now
is guess and speculate.
But we do know one thing Maggie Sanger would certainly have
been proud!
References: The Racism of Abortion.
[1] Erma Clardy Craven, chairwoman, Minneapolis Commission of Human
Relations. Quoted in T.W. Hilgers and D.J. Horan. Abortion and Social
Justice, article entitled "Abortion, Poverty, and Black
Genocide." New York: Sheed and Ward, 1972.
[2] "Women Are Not Incubators!: The Assault on Abortion
Rights." Revolutionary Worker, November 6, 1989. Also
distributed as a special reprint booklet, page 33.
[3] Civil rights activist and pacifist Dick Gregory. "My Answer
to Genocide." Ebony Magazine, October 1971.
[4] Erma Clardy Craven. "Abortion, Poverty, and Black
Genocide." T.W. Hilgers and D.J. Horan. Abortion and Social
Justice. New York: Sheed and Ward, 1972.
[5] Margaret Sanger's letter to Clarence Gamble, October 19, 1939, as
quoted Linda Gordon's Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History
of Birth Control in America. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976.
Also quoted in the National Federation for Decency Journal, June
1984, page 20.
[6] Havelock Ellis. "The World's Racial Problems." Birth
Control Review, October 1920, page 16.
[7] Lothrop Stoddard, Ph.D. The Rising Tide of Color Against White
World-Supremacy. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1921. Reprinted
in 1971 by Negro Universities Press, Westport, Connecticut. Pages i, 8,
9, 90, 231, 298, 301, 302, 308, and 309 in the reprinted version.
[8] Faye Wattleton, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of
America (PPFA), at PPFA's annual luncheon in St. Louis, on May 2, 1979.
[9] "Another Sanger Leads Planned Parenthood." The New
York Times, January 23, 1991, page B2.
[10] Delores Bernadette Grier, testifying before the Senate Labor and
Human Resources Committee during its May 1990 hearing on the
"Freedom of Choice Act." Quoted in Living World, Volume
5, Number 2, page 30.
[11] California abortionist Edward Allred, quoted in the San Diego
Union, October 12, 1980. This incident is also described in National
Right to Life News, May 2, 1985, page 4.
[12] Lawrence Lader, co-founder of the National Abortion Rights
Action League (NARAL), in his book Breeding Ourselves to Death,
page 23.
[13] Looseleaf booklet entitled "Organizing for Action."
Prepared by Vicki Z. Kaplan for the National Abortion Rights Action
League, 250 West 57th Street, New York, N.Y. 10019. 51 pages, no date.
See especially the chapter written by Emily C. Moore, Ph.D., entitled
"The Major Issues and the Argumentation in the Abortion
Debate," pages 33 to 43.
[14] Alexander Cockburn, quoted in Proletarian Revolution,
Fall 1989, page 28.
[15] John Benditt. "Special Report: Second-Trimester Abortions
in the United States." Planned Parenthood's Family Planning
Perspectives, November/December 1979, page 359.
[16] "Abortion and the Holocaust: Twisting the Language."
'Religious' Coalition for Abortion Rights, 100 Maryland Avenue NE,
Washington, DC 20002, telephone: (202) 543-7032. 1987, 24 pages. This
booklet is stylishly written and laid out on only the best paper. It
features five short essays by apostate 'Jews' and phony 'Christians'
that are masterpieces of Doublethink and propaganda. This booklet is
mandatory reading for any pro-lifer who wants insight into just how
clever pro-abort propaganda can be.
[17] Undated letter from Mrs. Mattie Byrd (mother of Belinda Byrd,
who died January 27, 1987), quoted in Feminists for Life of America amicus
brief in the case of Webster vs. Reproductive Health Services,
No. 88-605.
[18] Charles Darwin. The Descent of Man. Encyclopedia
Britannica, Inc., Chicago, London, and Toronto. Section I, Chapter
5. Also quoted in ALL About Issues, June-July 1986, page 42.
[19] Norman E. Hines, Ph.D. Practical Birth-Control Methods. New
York: Viking Press, 1946.
[20] Example shown is from Oregon statutes. The Oregonian,
January 29, 1990, page A12. Also see Gerald N. Grob, Mental Illness
and American Society, 1875-1940.
[21] Rodney Stark and James McEvoy III. "Middle-Class
Violence." Psychology Today, November 1970, pages 34-38.
[22] America Magazine, November 6, 1965, page 511.
[23] R.Z. Hallow. "The Blacks Cry Genocide." The Nation,
April 28, 1969, page 535.
[24] Erma Clardy Craven. "Abortion, Poverty, and Black
Genocide." T.W. Hilgers and D.J. Horan. Abortion and Social
Justice. New York: Sheed and Ward, 1972.
[25] Peggy Cuddy. "Abortion and Racial Genocide." ALL
About Issues, October 1983, pages 23 to 26.
[26] Linus Pauling. Foreword to "Reflections on the New
Biology." UCLA Law Review, February 1968, page 269.
[27] John Maynard Smith. "Eugenics and Utopia." Daedalus,
Summer 1989, page 91.
[28] "Interview: Garrett Hardin." Omni Magazine,
June 1992, pages 56 to 63.
[29] "Rural Doctor Proposes Sterilization Bounty." The
Oregonian, February 8, 1992, page B2.
[30] Garrett Hardin. "The History and Future of Birth
Control." Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. Autumn 1966.
[31] Paul Likoudis. "Five-Year Birth Control Device Approved By
FDA." The Wanderer, December 20, 1990, pages 3 and 12.
[32] Don Kimelman. "Poverty and Norplant: Can Contraception
Reduce the Underclass?" Philadelphia Enquirer, December 12,
1990.
[33] Clarence Page. "Hope Best Way to Fight Poverty." The
Oregonian, December 31, 1990, page C5.
[34] Mary Ann Kuharski. "Aborting the "At Risk"
Population: Racism Rears its Ugly Head." ALL About Issues,
Winter 1991, pages 16 and 17.
[35] "Abortion Held Way to Avoid Tyrants." Los Angeles
Times, May 20, 1970, part I, page 9.
[36] Joe Bigham. "Birth Control Order Stands Until Appeal."
The Oregonian, January 11, 1991, page A16.
[37] United States Supreme Court decision Buck v. Bell, 274 US
200 (1927), at 207.
[38] Robert Lipton. The Nazi Doctors (New York: Basic Books),
page 23.
[39] Allen Chase. The Legacy of Malthus: The Social Costs of the
New Scientific Racism (Chicago: University of Illinois Press), pages
69 and 316. Also New York: Knopf, 1976, page 349.
[40] As described in Frederick Osborne of the American Museum of
Natural History, in his 1940 book Preface to Eugenics (New York:
Harper and Row), page 35.
[41] Indian Women United for Social Justice. Voices of the Indian
Women. Los Angeles, 1979, page 1. Originally written by Constance
Redbird Uri, M.D.
[42] Peace and civil rights activist Dick Gregory, in his speech to
the third annual National Youth Pro-Life Coalition Thanksgiving for Life
convention, November 21, 1974.
Further Reading: The Racism of Abortion.
Robert Bluford and Robert E. Petres. Unwanted Pregnancy.
New York: Harper and Row, 1973. A frightening book that advocates
the elimination of the unwanted and undesirable, precisely as Binding
and Hoche did more than a half-century ago as they laid the foundation
for the Nazi mentality and the resulting Holocaust.
William Brennan. The Abortion Holocaust: Today's Final Solution.
1983, 237 pages. Order from Landmark Press, Post Office Box 13547,
1461 Dunn Road, St. Louis, Missouri 63138, or Life Issues Bookshelf, Sun
Life, Thaxton, Virginia 24174, telephone: (703) 586-4898, or American
Life Lobby, Post Office Box 490, Stafford, Virginia 22554. Reviewed by
David H. Andrusko on page 6 of the March 10, 1983 issue of National
Right to Life News and on page 34 of the April 1984 ALL About
Issues. This book is an incredibly detailed presentation of the
hundreds of parallels between the Nazi holocaust of World War II and the
one going on in the United States right now. Traces the development of
the holocausts from years before they 'went public' to their final
horrible configurations. The best available documentation of the more
than 225 intimate parallels between the original Holocaust and the one
now being perpetrated in our country. A 'must read' for pure interest
and fascinating facts.
Eugene F. Diamond, M.D. This Curette for Hire.
Order from: Life Issues Bookshelf, Sun Life, Thaxton, Virginia
24174, telephone: (703) 586-4898. The author discusses the deterioration
of medical ethics and the critical role of the doctor in all anti-life
activities: abortion, fetal experimentation, sterilization, euthanasia,
infanticide, sex therapy, and more.
Robert G. Marshall and Charles Donovan. Blessed Are the Barren:
The Social Policy of Planning Parenthood.
Ignatius Press, San Francisco. Reviewed by Mary Meehan on page 5 of
the November 29, 1992 National Catholic Register. This volume
provides lots of detail on the Planned Parenthood connections with
racist eugenics, the effort to capture the Black leadership, and its
ability to tap into hundreds of millions of dollars of tax and private
money.
Lothrop Stoddard, Ph.D. The Rising Tide of Color Against White
World-Supremacy.
New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1921. Reprinted in 1971 by Negro
Universities Press, Westport, Connecticut. A classic racist book that
clearly and vividly demonstrates the kind of thinking that led to
eugenics, the current-day racist abortion program in the United States,
and the Nazi mentality.
© American Life League BBS 1-703-659-7111
This is a chapter of the Pro-Life Activists Encyclopedia published
by American Life League.
|